Hum Factors. 2024 Jan;66(1):234-257. doi: 10.1177/00187208211063991. Epub 2022 Jan 10.


OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the effects of simultaneous and asynchronous masking on the detection and identification of visual and auditory alarms in close temporal proximity.

BACKGROUND: In complex and highly coupled systems, malfunctions can trigger numerous alarms within a short period of time. During such alarm floods, operators may fail to detect and identify alarms due to asynchronous and simultaneous masking. To date, the effects of masking on detection and identification have been studied almost exclusively for two alarms during single-task performance. This research examines 1) how masking affects alarm detection and identification in multitask environments and 2) whether those effects increase as a function of the number of alarms.

METHOD: Two experiments were conducted using a simulation of a drone-based package delivery service. Participants were required to ensure package delivery and respond to visual and auditory alarms associated with eight drones. The alarms were presented at various stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). The dependent measures included alarm detection rate, identification accuracy, and response time.

RESULTS: Masking was observed intramodally and cross-modally for visual and auditory alarms. The SOAs at which asynchronous masking occurred were longer than reported in basic research on masking. The effects of asynchronous and, even more so, simultaneous masking became stronger as the number of alarms increased.

CONCLUSION: Masking can lead to breakdowns in the detection and identification of alarms in close temporal proximity in complex data-rich domains.

APPLICATION: The findings from this research provide guidance for the design of alarm systems.

PMID:35012376 | DOI:10.1177/00187208211063991